Sunday Blahs
The acoustic thing is cool, I like doing it, but I think we need to work on making a sold 2-hour set. We probably have about an hour or so of material that looks and sounds great when we play unplugged. It might be worth really working on an acoustic set if that's something we planned on doing all the time.
I think that's part of the greater issue: When you're working on a live show, to what audience and venue are you suiting it for? When people go see a show that they expect to be an original concert, they expect to see 30-40 minutes of your band's music if you're the opener, and about an hour of material if you're the headliner.
When you're in a bar whose used to cover bands, they expect at least 2 to 3 hours of music and they usually don't care if it's cover or original (some of them do, but most are just looking to fill time with "live entertainment".)
We've been lucky to be able to play a lot of different places by having a more diverse set, being flexible, and having a bunch of covers that we can throw out when we run out of our A material, the fact that we're not too stuck up about what we have to play to be able to get into a venue. But sometimes I think that it might be hurting us to learn and work on stuff that's not our own, because we're deviating from the process of writing or fine-tuning our music to make it better.
That's what an acoustic set feels like sometimes, are we taking away time from being the best electric band we can be by concentrating on something that's not our specialty? Probably not, because some acoustic versions of songs take on a life of their own. But it's better to make sure that the material we're taking the time to work on sounds as good as it can and it accomplishes what we do best.
Here's an example. I think learning "Time in a Bottle" would be awesome for an acoustic show, but unless we're gonna make it our own, it's just not worth the effort and the time to make it sound great and our own. We only have a finite amount of time between working, living, trying to promote, etc... we have to focus on making the 45 minute show (which is probably the category of venue and band that we should be probably trying to fit into) the most intense and very best we possibly can, then maybe stretch that time into something longer and with a different energy at another venue. The problem is that the venues in the smaller towns that demand the longer shows pay a lot more than the venues in the cities. At this stage of the game, that money can be important to keep the rockstar lifestyle afloat. Less competition, heavier drink sales, more appreciation, I don't know exactly that is, but that's the way it goes. I guess to keep doing what we do, we have to keep balancing between having longer sets at some places, shorter ones at others, acoustic here and electric there, but how do we make sure we get maximum impact at each one?
That's the shitty part to figure out, I guess.


